How Much Is 3.2 Tablespoons of Cooking Wine in Grams?
3.2 tablespoons of cooking wine equals 46.40 g. Cooking wine has a density of 232g per cup (14.5g per tablespoon), which means it's relatively light compared to other common cooking ingredients. For comparison, 3.2 tablespoons of honey would be 68 g.
Formula and Step-by-Step
- Start with 3.2 tablespoons of cooking wine
- 1 tablespoon of cooking wine = 14.5g
- 3.2 × 14.5 = 46.4g
The same formula works for any amount. Multiply (or divide) by the density, then convert units as needed.
Measuring Tip
For liquids, place your measuring spoon on a flat surface and read at eye level. The bottom of the meniscus (the curve at the surface) should align with the measurement line.
Cooking Wine at Different Amounts
How cooking wine scales across common tablespoons measurements. Your amount (3.2 tablespoons) is highlighted.
For reference, 3.2 tablespoons of cooking wine (46.4g) is close in weight to a golf ball (46g).
Other Amounts of Cooking Wine
| Tablespoons | US Grams | Metric Tablespoon | Australian Tablespoon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 tablespoon | 14.50 g | 14.71 g | 19.61 g |
| 2 tablespoons | 29.00 g | 29.42 g | 39.22 g |
| 3 tablespoons | 43.50 g | 44.13 g | 58.84 g |
| 3.2 tablespoons | 46.40 g | 47.07 g | 62.76 g |
| 4 tablespoons | 58.00 g | 58.84 g | 78.45 g |
| 5 tablespoons | 72.50 g | 73.54 g | 98.06 g |
| 6 tablespoons | 87.00 g | 88.25 g | 117.67 g |
| 8 tablespoons | 116.00 g | 117.67 g | 156.89 g |
| 10 tablespoons | 145.00 g | 147.09 g | 196.12 g |
| 12 tablespoons | 174.00 g | 176.51 g | 235.34 g |
| 16 tablespoons | 232.00 g | 235.34 g | 313.79 g |
Understanding the Units
What is a Tablespoon?
A tablespoon (tbsp) is a US customary unit of volume equal to 14.787 milliliters, 3 teaspoons, or 1/16 of a cup. It is commonly used for measuring smaller amounts of ingredients.
What is a Gram?
A gram (g) is a metric unit of mass equal to 1/1000 of a kilogram. It is the standard weight measurement for precise baking worldwide. Professional bakers prefer grams because they are more accurate than volume measurements.